HMWYBS: Lana Turner Is “The Bad and the Beautiful”


The Bad and the Beautiful may be the best movie about movies made during the era of the Studio System. Balancing reality with romance, Vincente Minnelli’s film is a perfect example of how Hollywood could make itself look good even when it was being bad. The framing narrative of the three point-of-view characters – also used to great effect in Citizen Kane and All About Eve – is key. However, The Bad And The Beautiful is not only three different views of one character (Kirk Douglas, as the bad and beautiful producer Jonathan Shields) it’s also three different stories of one industry: the business of moviemaking (through the director), the business of star creation (through the actress), and the business of the movie business (through the writer). I’m going to focus on the actress because, as Kirk Douglas himself says early on, when Lana Turner is on screen, you can’t tear your eyes away. That’s star quality, and that’s what her story – in the film and out of it – is about.

 In LA Confidential, Detective Exley sneers that “a hooker cut to look like Lana Turner is still a hooker,” but the opposite is true as well: Lana Turner, even when she plays trash, is still Lana Turner. This holds especially true in The Bad And The Beautiful; when Turner’s character, Georgia Lorrison, is introduced, she’s supposed to be the drunk, easy actress who lives in squalor. Instead she is Lana Turner: icy, glamorous, with perfect hair and (to borrow a line from The Women) those eyes that go up and down a man like a  searchlight.

"Trashy" Lana

“Trashy” Lana

The reason for this is twofold: First, as previously mentioned, Lana Turner is never not Lana Turner, and second, it was apparently impossible for Vincente Minnelli to make his leading actresses look anything less than glamorous. Judy Garland was never lovelier than she was in Minnelli’s movies, but Lana Turner needed no such help (though she got it anyway). Because of this, when Turner goes through the requisite showbiz makeover scene in the film, the only thing the makeup artist can do is outline her already perfect eyebrows.

Lana's "makeover"

Lana’s “makeover”

 However, though both Minnelli and Turner are incapable making Lana less than Lana, one element of Turner’s image is conspicuously absent from the first half of her story: that dangerous sexuality, born of knowing too much and growing curves too early. What makes Turner brilliant in The Postman Always Rings Twice, Ziegfeld Girl, and Peyton Place is that she shares the one part of herself that doesn’t fit into the Hollywood Ice Queen image: her sexuality. It’s what kept her from being a straight ingenue when she was still the Sweater Girl; not only did she fill out that cardigan in sinful ways, she knew that she did. It was easy to believe that she could make scandals with gangsters or be mistaken for a hooker, this too-trashy-for-the-Ivory-Tower element to Lana that stood out like a sexually-charged beacon.  Through her first scenes, she’s been tragically trashy, but not smoldering. The first appearance of that Lana isn’t until midway through Georgia’s story, when she’s asked to perform for the camera a second time.

Best Shot

This is Georgia’s first big film role: one line about a book. The first take, she plays the scene straight (and dull), asking her lead if he’s read a book as if she’s asking him about the weather. Then, Douglas whispers something in her ear, and in the second take she’s transformed. She whispers her line in a low voice, barely looking at Gaucho. Like the audience, he is drawn to her, and she acknowledges her victory with the ghost of a knowing smile. The implication is this: that raw sexuality, that seemingly untamed element of Lana Turner that could slay mobsters and shatter censors is an act. Somebody somewhere — maybe a producer whispering to her on a set, maybe a publicity agent spinning stories about Schwabs and sweaters, or maybe a horny newspaper with eyes for busty blonde teenagers — taught her the act of seduction. It sounds sleazy because it is.

 The Bad And The Beautiful is, in many ways, the anti-A Star Is Born. If there’s one lesson to be taken from the Lana Turner/Georgia Lorrison story, whether onscreen or off, it’s this: stars are not born; they’re made. Even the sharpest edge of a star’s image has been honed by the studio. Georgia, Lana, and Minnelli show you only what they want you to see. But then again, that’s what you want to see too.


About Anne Marie Kelly

Classic Film history & restoration nerd. Writer of A Year With Kate and Women's Pictures for The Film Experience. Follow me on Twitter @WeRecycleMovies.
This entry was posted in Film and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to HMWYBS: Lana Turner Is “The Bad and the Beautiful”

  1. Squasher88 says:

    Very nice post. The comparison with “A Star is Born” is interesting also when you think about the makeover scene in this vs the one in that film. Lana really is so naturally glamorous, but as you said that extra sensuality is perfectly crafted for the movies.

  2. joelnox says:

    Good take on what makes a star vs. a performer. Performers can be riveting, make characters live on screen or stage and often seem different from role to role but a star’s mysterious x factor will trump them almost ever time. It’s something inborn even if it changes over time as Lana’s did from a kittenish sensuality to a more carnal type as she aged but there’s a presence that the camera captures and holds in a timeless manner. Even decades later it lingers, certain actresses retain their power and draw you in: Lana, Veronica Lake, Marilyn, Betty Grable, Stanwyck, Davis, Crawford, Natalie Wood while watching other equally beautiful and or talented women like June Haver, Carole Landis or Dolores Moran-all considerably well known in their day but not top rank stars remain just that, pleasing personalities that disappear from your memory as soon as the film ends.

    It’s something that endures to this day. It’s why Brad Pitt is Brad Pitt and a host of talented but less magnetic actors: Brendan Fraser, Val Kilmer, Kurt Russell, Brad Rowe etc. fall by the wayside.

    While it’s true that they weren’t really able to make Lana look a wreck I think TBATB is her best work. She may have looked great but in her early scenes there’s a weariness there that feels bone deep.

    • Anne Marie says:

      I absolutely agree on all counts! Especially in relation to Lana, thanks to back-to-back screenings of Ziegfeld Girl and The Bad And The Beautiful, I’ve quickly changed my opinion of her acting abilities. I think she’s phenomenal in this film.

      • joelnox says:

        I love Ziegfeld Girl! Lana tears it up in the film, she’s ultimately tragic but she’s funny and flip along the way and of course glamorous. It’s easy to see why this was the film that pushed her to the top of the MGM roost. As showy as her part is she’s not the whole movie, Hedy is breathtaking and Judy a cyclone of talent, her version of I’m Always Chasing Rainbows is exquisite. The only real quibble I have with the picture is that if any film ever cried out for color it’s this one. Probably wartime shortages were responsible but it would have made those amazing and bizarre costumes pop.

  3. Pingback: Hurry! Please nominate Yvonne De Carlo and Walter Pidgeon for Canada’s Walk of Fame | Bunnybun's Classic Movie Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s