Hammer Horror Blogathon: Curse Of Frankenstein

This week as part of Classic Film & TV Cafe‘s Hammer Horror Blogathon, it is my ghoulish delight to review for you the 1957 Hammer Films classic, The Curse of Frankenstein. The 1950s were a fertile period for B Horror; America had William Castle and a young upstart named Roger Corman, and Britain had Hammer Films. The instant camp classics these folks produced are worth a second glance. Their gruesome horror pushed boundaries on censorship just as much as the French filmmakers’ discussion of sex. It’s easy to accuse Hammer Films, and especially its most famous film The Curse of Frankenstein of being cheesy or derivative, but it’s also a filmic tribute to things that go bump in the night. The success of Hammer Films proved that we like to be scared, and so The Curse of Frankenstein is, for good or for worse, a direct ancestor of today’s blockbuster horror films.

curseoffrankenstein1

Of course, The Curse of Frankenstein is derivative. Mary Shelley’s novel was a meditation on the question of the human soul. James Whale’s film was an allegory about persecution. The Curse of Frankenstein is a mess of madness. Elements of the story remain the same: Victor Frankenstein creates a monster that terrorizes the countryside. However, the real monster of the film is Victor Frankenstein, played with scene-stealing relish by Peter Cushing. Frankenstein isn’t simply a madman, he’s a sociopath. The majority of the film is actually concerned with Frankenstein building the monster, a detail both the novel and the 1931 film skipped. Frankenstein cuts down hanged men, digs up freshly dead factory workers, and eventually resorts to outright murder in order to piece together his monster.

Once the monster lives, the chaos grows. Under all of that bizarre makeup is actually Christopher Lee, starting his decades-long career in horror and science fiction. He looks bizarre, speaks not a word, and murders anything put directly in front of him. A shout out to Whale’s film comes in the form of the kindly blind man, who is murdered by the monster before a touching scene about humanity can play out. Eventually, the monster murders one person too many, and Victor buries the monster in acid before Victor is arrested for the crimes he now cannot prove he did not commit.

curseoffrankenstein2

If you were going to read too much into the film, it would be easy to see the monster as the embodiment of Frankenstein’s madness. It’s a walking, growling id in prosthetic makeup. This is a common theme in monster movies, everything from The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari to Forbidden Planet has toyed with the idea. However, while that argument can definitely be made, to read so much into the film is to miss the joy and intent of it. The Curse Of Frankenstein is horror at its most basic; immediate, visceral, and something you laugh at until the lights flicker out.

Be sure to check more of Classic Film & TV Cafe’s Hammer Horror Blogathon! Do you have a favorite B Horror movie? Comment below!

Advertisements

About Anne Marie Kelly

Classic Film history & restoration nerd. Writer of A Year With Kate and Women's Pictures for The Film Experience. Follow me on Twitter @WeRecycleMovies.
This entry was posted in Film and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Hammer Horror Blogathon: Curse Of Frankenstein

  1. Rick says:

    I wouldn’t call CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN derivative because it takes a very different approach from the Universal films in which Karloff’s Monster overshadows Colin Clive’s ineffective Henry Frankenstein. In fact, the success of CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN can be attributed to screenwriter Jimmy Sangster’s brilliant decision to make the doctor the film’s focus (as opposed to the Monster). Of course, it helps that Victor is played by the incomparable Peter Cushing; the amazing part of his portrayal is that–because of Victor’s incredible passion to create life–we root for him despite the fact that he’s essentially a villain.

  2. christmastv says:

    THIS sounds interesting! Thanks for participating. I have to add this to my growing list of what to watch.

  3. Enjoyed your look at the movie very much. I haven’t seen it in quite a while and it’s due for a revisit. Although, I think I’ll leave the lights on.

  4. ClassicBecky says:

    You said it! “The success of Hammer Films proved that we like to be scared…” I do, and the Hammer films are a good example of the type of scare that is the most fun. A real scare for me tends to be the more psychological fright, but the fun scare is Hammer’s Frankenstein, Dracula and Mummy movies. I wish I had been a little older in the 50’s — I was there, but not quite old enough to go to the movies to see these. I enjoyed them on TV, and still do!

  5. I enjoy this version of Shelley’s story, putting it all squarely on Dr. F’s shoulders. Enjoyed your review!

  6. Kevin Deany says:

    “The Curse of Frankenstein” is a fine start to what is one of the most unheralded series in horror movie history. Hammer’s Frankenstein series shows a doctor, already quite mad though containing a dollop of humanity, deteriorate over six films into a complete and total sociopath. The Baron is probably Cushing’s greatest achievement. It’s not the best film in their Frankenstein series, but its a good start.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s